May 31, 2026

Venice Biennale 2026

Impressions from the Venice Art Biennale 2026
Day 1/5 - visiting 28 pavilions near and in Giardini








         The Venice Art Biennale was established in 1895 and has been, since, the world's largest fair of contemporary art, consisting of:

- national pavilions (99 this year situated in Giardini - a garden area, Arsenale - a former ship building complex and various other locations around Venice), in which countries decide which artist will represent them.
- the curator's international exhibition, in which artists (110 this year) are invited individually and presented in the central pavilions in Giardini and Arsenale. 

In addition to the official sites, hundreds of exhibitions are organised during the Biennale by the world's leading art galleries, foundations, and Venice institutions, which are held in churches, palazzos, museums, and cultural spaces around the city.

This year's Biennale curator set the theme "In Minor Keys", inviting artists and visitors to slow down, and listen to the lower tones; she suggests contemplation and reflection. 


But first things first, coffee!



Serra dei Giardini - cafe/bistro right next to the entrance into the Giardini complex. Built in 1894 for the purpose of conserving and preparing plants for the first Art Exhibition in the Giardini complex.




Next, before entering Giardini, we visited pavilions near it: Cuba, the Holy See, Catalonia and Iceland:

Hombre Libre,
Cuba Pavilion




Tintoretto's Creation of the Animals, which can be seen in the Academia Gallery in Venice, in a modern visualisation,
Holy See pavilion 

In this year's Holy See pavilion, artists like Patti Smith, Jim Jarmusch, Brian Eno, Anselm Kiefer, among others, took part. Patty Smith performed at the opening. 


Next, right after the entrance to Giardini, a huge, origami-like sculpture of a deer hangs from a crane truck! There is a movie about it, a captivating story about how the artist transported this deer sculpture all the way from the front lines in Ukraine through Europe to Venice! 

Security Guarantees,
Ukrainian Pavilion



Starting with the pavilion which engaged people the most: Japan. The artist filled the pavilion with 200 silicon babies, some of them firmly positioned and some for visitors to pick up, carry around, feed, and change their diapers! Some babies are positioned around TV screens playing Japanese family shows. A very Instagrammable set-up, which seems to be an important criterion for conceptual art today. This artist is a queer coparent of twin babies, addressing the issue of parenthood modelling through media in Japan.

Grass Babies, Moon Babies 
Japan Pavilion

UK: This is one of the most powerful exhibitions this year (although I think it responds better to the 2024 Biennale theme - Foreigners Everywhere). From the general idea - what is home, how to make one place a home, what if that place does not want you? Powerful, imposing paintings, standing in front of them, you feel the life spilling out. The artist is challenging you to ask yourself many questions, like, how do you feel where you live, do you feel you belong, and might you ever leave? 



Predicting History: Testing Translation
UK Pavilion


Germany is another strikingly strong and inspiring exhibition that also deals with the concept of home, but in a different way. Created by two artists: one has enveloped the pavilion building with 3 million tiny tiles, copying the facade of the socialist housing block in East Germany, where she grew up and which will soon be destroyed (see in the next post how the Indian pavilion also refers to a vanished home). She even copied the graffiti on the facade.  Extraordinary, and what's sad is that most visitors do not notice this. 
As the perfect other half of the exhibition, the pavilion's interior plays on interiors and the notion of everyday objects and furniture in apartments in Germany in the 90's. The artist said she was interested in "archaeological history of the present". It made me think about: can our home aesthetics predict our political views? Do people on one side of the political spectrum choose similar chairs? And also it made me think about the coincidence of the ideas in the UK - Predicting History and Germany's 'archaeology of the present' idea, with such different realisations. And how art is exactly that, unique answers to universal questions. 

Ruin,
German pavilion


Venice has its own pavilion in the Giardini complex, and Italy has its own in the Arsenale. The Venetian pavilion was, as usual, visually innovative and pleasing. This year, we enter into a space, and we seem to be underwater. We hear distant and muffled piano sounds while hanging above us, like they're floating are disassembled piano parts. As we are moving through the space, the piano parts get closer, and we arrive at the complete piano on the ground with a clear sound coming from it. In the second part of the expo, pavilion curators asked 700 Venetian citizens to bring a personal item and tell their personal story about Venice. So, we are walking among glass boxes like in an archaeological museum, where different objects have a short story usually related to a particular life memory. Touching and time-consuming in the best way, this exhibition is one of those after which you need to sit down, have another coffee and write a couple of thoughts so they don't escape you.


Note Persistenti
Venitian pavilion



Australia had the strongest visuals for me, as a long curved canvas wall was painted abstractly with colours on the blue and purple spectrum, within which you can find, here and there, some face-like shapes. Then the lights behind the canvas go on and move in different directions, while colours become stronger and livelier, the human shapes disappear, and it leaves you wondering, what is real and what is imaginary. Of course, poor Michael, with his challenged colour recognition, couldn't really participate in any of that. There is much more content and context in the Australian exhibition, of course. There is also a historical first - this artist represents their country, but is also present in the curator's international exhibition, as she wanted to save him when Australian politicians tried to ban his representation at the Biennale. 



 
Conference of One's Self,
Australian pavilion




Qatar made a beautiful tent-like open structure as their pavilion for the first time in Giardini (the rumour has it that they paid the Venice local government budget 50 million euros for the permit), providing a space to shelter from the sun, to play video works, have concerts and discussions, which is exactly what it has been used for since the beginning of the Biennale. There is also a thought-provoking sculpture, an oversized water canister with the inscription "Lovely Gift from Blessed Land, 

Untitled (A Gathering of Remarkable People),
Qatar pavilion





Special case: Austria - considering this artist's previous work (self-hurting, live intercourses, and such), the Biennale visitors are mercifully spared, but her method and message are no less apologetic - the bells for the end of the world toll, and to get us all to listen, she climbs the bell naked and hanging upside down, strikes the bell. She is evoking the Bosch painting The Last Judgement (displayed in the Bruges museum). We did take pictures from far away, but didn't enter the pavilion and watch other moments of the exhibition; it felt enough to read about them, which you can do too with the link provided at the end. 

Seaworld Venice,
Austria pavilion



And this is a photo I took of a lady checking her phone in the Finland pavilion. Her curly hair at the top corresponded beautifully to a curled-up huge hair-like wig structure, one of 5; under each, there is a different wind blowing from below, creating different effects. She didn't seem impressed.



Aeolian Suite,
Finland pavilion


The Spanish pavilion was also interesting, with thousands of vintage postcards wallpapered on all the walls. People seemed interested and spent a lot of time looking. Serbia's concept was similar, but 'wallpaper' was made from the old original photos taken of people in the Balkans. Greece also had an interesting and engaging pavilion that felt like a Sado-Mazo gay club, playing Frankie Goes to Hollywood on repeat, and with plenty of interesting mirrors where we and many others took selfies. Lots of comfy places to sit and lounge, only to realise when you sit down that he is portraying all the people lost to aids or brutality and discrimination in Greece in the 80s and 90s.

To end with an example of how art and reality can collide, here is the story of the US pavilion. 

We decided to skip visiting it this year, since the US administration ignored the long-established selection process. The person in charge of it is a Florida jewellery shop owner who is a friend of somebody in the US State Department who can sign the budget for the Venice Biennale. Because of this and thousands of other much stronger reasons, the US pavilion was largely ignored by the visitors. Apparently, a couple of days ago, the situation changed. People are gathering in front of it and staying there for some time. Why? Well, we should not underestimate the Florida jewellery shop owner; she spread golden rice-sized nuggets into the gravel in front of the pavilion. It only took a couple of influencers to show their hands full of gold, and voila, visitors are there now, and they are digging through dust and stones.



For more:










November 30, 2025

Post 16: "The Purple Haze" in Impressionism

 "Purple does something strange to me"

Charles Bukowski

 (The People Look Like Flowers at Last, 2007)


To help us understand why the colour purple  (also known as violet, lilac, or mauve) was so abundantly used by the Impressionists, let's take a look first at their colours in general.

The Impressionists were "the colourists", meaning they favoured colour over lines.  Additionally, colour to them carried more meaning than simply filling in the contours expectedly. With their colours, they stated: This is how I see it, and opened the freedom of expression doors for future artists. And so a hundred years later, we will have Mark Rothko saying: This is how I feel it, using exactly, and only, blocks of colour to express himself.

Unlike any seen in art before, Impressionists' colours were radically brilliant and vivid. Wynford Dewhurst (Impressionist Painting, 1904) explains: "The Impressionists purified the palette, discarding blacks, browns, ochres, and muddy colours generally,… These they replaced by new and brilliant combinations, the result of modern chemical research. Cadmium Pale, Violet de Cobalt, Garance rose doré, enabled them to attain a higher degree of luminosity than was before possible."


Hermitage Garden, Maison Rouge, 1877
Camille Pissarro (1830-1903)
50 x 60 cm, oil on canvas
Private Collection



Intertwined, science and industry transformed every aspect of society in the 19th century, art included, via experimental artists. Two important things happened, making it possible for the Impressionists to become revolutionary colourists: Michel Chevreul's Theory of Colours (he discovered that complementary colours, from the opposite sides of the wheel, put next to each other, enhance each other) and the Industrial production of synthetic dyes. 

Fun fact: Chevreul is one of the 72 scientists, engineers, mathematicians, whose names Eiffel engraved on the Eiffel Tower for the 1889 opening. Anticipating attacks from groups that found it ugly, Eiffel decided to 'armour' the tower with the names of prominent inventors since the French Revolution. Even funnier fact: Impressionists, although they approved of the Eiffel Tower and saw it as a symbol of progress and modernity, never actually painted it! 

Pissarro (painting above), being "The first Impressionist", as Cezanne called him, was leading the way in embracing and implementing complementary colours contrast and harmony theory. He even framed his bright, yellow-bathed paintings in purple frames!  Cezanne, in his 10-year Impressionist period, learned about colour from Pissarro, proudly presenting himself as "Cézanne the pupil of Pissarro".





                                      
Cliff Walk at Pourville, 1882
Claude Monet (1840-1926)
66.5 x 82.3 cm, oil on canvas


This breezy Monet painting is the one I chose to do a colour analysis for an Oxford course. Here is a brief version of it: 

For The Cliff Walk, Monet used bright hues of blue, green and yellow with touches of purple, pink, and orange. The shadowed areas (the dark sides of the cliff) have the same blue, green, and purple hues as the upper side of the cliff, but without the touches of yellow, white and pink. The sky is painted with translucent, thin and almost transparent layers, while the rest of the painting is done with opaque, thick ones. Emphasising the focus, the paint texture is most visible on the human figures and the umbrella. The lightest tone of the sea and the darkest tones of the cliff meet in the middle, creating a dramatic vertical. The effect of wind in the moving thick grass is achieved by short, curved brushstrokes of complementary colours put next to each other - blue next to yellow and orange next to green. 

There it was, the fundamentally different way of painting, using brush and hand movements, textures and colour thickness to achieve the desired effect. For the first time, artists are letting us see the process and the method. The irrevocable democratisation of art. The viewer is invited to engage. Modern art is born.




Waterloo Bridge in London, 1902
Claude Monet (1840-1926)
65.7 x 100.5 cm, oil on canvas


The House of Parliament, Seagulls, 1903
Claude Monet (1840-1926)
81 x 92 cm, oil on canvas



Now, about that "Purple Mania". The major reason for it was that Purple or Mauveine was the first synthetic dye to be developed in 1856 (UK). Then came the invention of cobalt violet in 1859 (France) and manganese violet in 1868 (Germany). With mass industrial production, artists gained access to a stable, long-lasting colour, packed in portable tubes for the first time. First, there was purple, and then over 2,000 synthetic dyes by 1913.

Before the mid-19th century, according to one study, purple could be found in only 0.06% of the 140,000 artworks examined (The World According to Colour, James Fox from Allen Tager's article). Artists avoided it as it aged badly, and therefore wasn't worth mixing pure blue and red for it. 

Monet had an additional advantage: his brother Leon had worked in the Swiss synthetic dye company Geigy since 1872 and gave Monet a tour of the factory near Roen. While in London, Monet painted a series (examples above) of the Waterloo Bridge (15 paintings) and The Houses of Parliament (19 paintings), all of which were studies and variations of light and purple colour discreetly interrupted by the architecture. At the time, critics called his London paintings - 'purple smears"! They were right in the sense that Monet basically painted the heavily polluted fog and smog over London. 



L'Hortensia, 1894
Berthe Morisot (1841-1895)
73,1 x 60,4 cm, oil on canvas

Paule Gobillard Painting, 1887
Berthe Morisot (1841-1895)
86 x 94 cm, oil on canvas


Après le Déjeuner (After Lunch), 1881
81 x 100 cm, oil on canvas
Berthe Morisot (1841-1895)


Now stable and affordable, purple synthetic dye bled from canvases into shops, ballrooms and households. It was known that this colour was the favourite of Empress Eugenie, often called the "Empress of fashion". Her reign ended in 1870, right at the time when purple dye became widely available. Ladies were crazy about it; finally, the middle classes could wear the 'royal' colour!

Art critics despised synthetic paints, especially those with a purple hue. They saw it as disrespectful to naturalism, a degradation and a real madness or mania. Many of the attacks came from journalists inexperienced in looking at colour in paintings, and instead focused on the narrative or metaphors. They thought of themselves as witty while writing things as "coloured wool" (Bertall on Monet, Thomson p.190) or "the tub of soapy water in which the Batignolles school drowns everything indiscriminately..."(Baron Schop on Impressionists, Thomson p.191) 


Danseuses aux jupes violettes, bras leves 
(Dancers in violet robes, raised hands), 1895-98
Edgar Degas (1834-1917)
90 x 53 cm, pastel

More than anything, purple paint was a statement for the Impressionists. It was a torch they carried in the battle against conformity, tradition, dusty rules and uniformity. To critics' annoyance, for the Impressionists, the subject was of very little importance ("He didn't allow things time to take hold of him", Bonnard on Monet, Thomson p. 220). The depiction of a sensation created by the play of colour and light was the only relevant goal.

"Not allowing things to take hold of him" could also be a perfect phrase for Rothko's work.  Here is the non-denominational chapel he created in Houston, Texas. A place "welcoming all religions and belonging to none". A place for praying, meditating, and thinking. 

Looking at light moving over time across purple panels, to me, is as fine a closing as any to this 100 Years of Purple and Art Story. 



Mark Rothko Chapel Photo






Sources:

Books:  
Impressionist Painting: Its Genesis and Development, by Wynford Dewhurst, Project Gutenberg eBook, The World According to Colour: A Cultural History (2021) by James Fox; Impressionism, Origins, Practice, Reception by Belinda Thomson


August 15, 2025

Post 15: Paintings only Female Impressionists could have painted

 



Steady as She Goes


"I love to see a young girl go out and grab the world by the lapels.
 Life is a bitch. 
You've got to go out and kick ass."
Maya Angelou, interview, 1986




Petit Fille dans un fauteuil bleu (Little Girl in a Blue Armchair), 1878
Mary Cassatt (1844-1926)
89.5 x 129.8 cm, oil on canvas
Little Girl National Gallery of Art Wash.DC



        

La Chambre Bleue (The Blue Room), 1923
Susan Valadon (1865-1938)
90 x 116 cm, oil on canvas
The Blue Room Centre Pompidou


I positioned these two 'blue' paintings next to each other, firstly because I love them dearly, and secondly, they certainly could have been painted only by women painters. 

Both were painted in Paris, the first one 22 years before 1900, and the other 23 years after 1900, providing a perfect frame for a period in which girls born into a restrictive society grew up to live in a rather progressive one. A little bored rebel who doesn't want to "sit properly", as well as a relaxed, self-sufficient, feeling-good-in-her-body smoker and reader, both were given freedom to rest comfortably and not pose. Only women painters could have given them that freedom.

Cassatt's iconic "Girl in a Blue Armchair", rejected by the American section of the Paris World's Fair for its "radicality" in 1878, was welcomed at the 1879 Impressionist exhibition, and opened the door for her to Parisian and international collectors. 

About 40 years later, Valadon's powerful "The Blue Room" portrays a woman who seems to have "kicked some ass" in her lifetime. A modern painting of a free modern woman. Although the years match, this could never be the grown-up girl from the first painting, as Cassatt and Valadon belonged to and painted two deeply segregated classes. Valadon, being a child at the same time as the little girl in the blue chair, was rarely bored; instead, she worked hard, helping her mother wash laundry for exactly those kinds of bourgeois families. 




Dans la Loge, 1878
Mary Cassatt (1844-1926)
81.28x66.04 cm, oil on canvas



Le Berceau (The Cradle), 1872
Berthe Morisot (1841-1895)
56 x 46.5 cm, oil on canvas
Le Berceau Morisot Orsay


After two paintings of women not bothered that we are looking at them, here are two Impressionist paintings of women looking at others, and the way they are doing that, makes these works modern and clearly painted by women.

Cassatt's Dans la Loge depicts a woman not as the object of beauty, purity, or virtue. Cassatt is capturing the ultimate contemporary moment: a free woman doing what is not expected in public space! She, just like a man, is actively looking at others instead of being a passive object of gaze. She is gazing. Whether her age gives her that freedom or her personality, she doesn't care what others think, including the man we see in the upper left corner. Some art historians even mention the phallic position of the fan in her hand. Cassatt is sending an unambiguous message: women are free to be as good or as bad as men.  

Next is the most famous painting by the most famous female Impressionist, Berthe Morisot. She showed this painting at the first Impressionist exhibition in 1874. Berthe participated in 7 out of 8 Impressionist exhibitions (missing one after the birth of her daughter). Besides the refined technique (the see-through curtain), we have a ground-breaking presentation of motherhood that opens many questions and provokes a debate, as great paintings usually do. Can you tell what is missing? The smile. Morisot portrays her sister Edna (at least as talented a painter as Berthe, who had to give up her artistic career after getting married and having a child) with an ambiguous facial expression. Is the woman in the painting tired, worried, or is it possible that she is missing being an artist and lamenting her choices? A century and a half later, women around the world can still relate to this painting and recognize that dilemma. Only a woman painter could have left that question open. This painting was bought in 1930 by the Louvre. Morisot, like Cassatt, could only dream during their lifetime of any museum buying their work. 

In the second half of the 19th century, the French government rarely bought female artists' paintings for national collections and museums (only 3% of all purchases, source Paris in Ruins). Their work would usually end up in private collections, where it often stayed to this day. That is one of many reasons why we see so few female artists in museum collections. A significant example being London's National Gallery - in its 2300 painting collection, only 21 are by women artists (9 of them). An innovative private guide in London offers a tour exploring those 21 paintings (link in sources).

Another reason would be that, in art history studies, women artists are usually all grouped in one chapter, like exotic birds, and presented only through the prism of how discriminated against they were from the present point of view. Or, more outrageously, not presented at all: the most famous art historian of the 20th century, in his widely referenced, 700-page opus, The Story of Art (the main book in the Oxford course I took), which covers art from prehistoric to modern, does not mention a single non-white or female artist. 

But, let's go back to people whose work aged well, like Louise Breslou. So, here is the one that "rebelled the system from within". She stayed loyal to Salon exhibitions, never joined the Impressionists, and yet didn't compromise her identity.



Gamines (Girls), 1890
Loise Catherine Breslau (1856- 1927)
120 x 220 cm, oil on canvas

I had the pleasure of standing in front of this huge, powerful painting three times. This photo doesn't do it any service, and the website of the Museum in Carpentras is of no help either. The happiness sparkles from every dot on this canvas, colours are vibrant and playful, and it is a pure joy to witness it in person.

This is one of the first paintings portraying an unorthodox subject for that time, a couple of women in love. No male painter would be allowed into this intimate moment. Loise Breslau lived with her girlfriend, also an artist, Madeleine Zillhardt, for 40 years.  They met at the Parisian Julian Academy (the only one taking female students at the time, but charging them more than men!), and Loise was the one who had a big, flourishing career. Her paintings were regularly exhibited at the Salon, well-received, won awards, and were actually bought by the French government. She also received the French Legion of Honour.



Henry Davison, 1880
Louise Breslau (1856-1927)
87 x 46 cm, oil on canvas

Now, if we look at how Louise portrays young British poet Davison, we could say that masculinity or even gender is not the point of attention here. He reminds me here of his contemporary Oscar Wilde, who was, among other things, a big supporter of women's emancipation. 

Thinking about it, I would say that one big contribution by female artists to society is bringing androgyny to the public eye and loosening up the assigned gender roles and looks. To illustrate my point, below are 2 enigmatic paintings by the outstanding Romaine Brooks, who took queerness to the next level:



Peter (A Young English Girl), 1923-24
Romaine Brooks (1874-1970)
91.9 x 62.3 cm, oil on canvas




Self-Portrait, 1923
117.5 x 68.3 cm, oil on canvas
Romaine Brooks (1874-1979)


In her self-portrait, by wearing lipstick and men's clothes, Brooks (also awarded the Legion of Honour) claims the right to define for herself who she is. Primarily, women in their path of emancipation wanted to be perceived as persons, and on that path, female artists certainly carried their weight.

Romaine Brooks lived an extraordinary life, almost 100 years long, but decided to stop painting after finishing this portrait at the age of 49.

I suppose in life, an equally important skill to keep going is knowing when to stop.




Sources:

Books: The Story of Art Without Men (Katy Hessel) and Representing Women (Linda Nochlin)

Getting There: Maya Angelou - POLITICO

Women in the National Gallery - guided tour to see female artists

Bing Videos - In Loge, Khan Academy commentary

Christies - Christian Levett's collection of Ancient to Modern Art from the Mougins Museum of Classical Art

Deux jeunes filles près de l'eau - Louise Breslau | Musée d'Orsay - preparatory drawing

Mary Cassatt's Famous Paintings & Feminism - iTravelWithArt

La Luministe - The Passionate Life of Berthe Morisot - iTravelWithArt

The Women Who Dared to Paint | Sotheby’s Magazine | Sotheby’s

Rewriting Art History: How Fede Galizia Brings Women Artists into Focus | Expert Voices | Sotheby’s

3 Women Artists Who Broke Boundaries | 19th Century European Art | Sotheby's

Kunsthalle Bremen

Who Are the Most Important Female Impressionists?

List of women Impressionists - Wikipedia

Women Artists in Paris, 1850-1900: Madeline, Laurence, Alsdorf, Bridget, Becker, Jane R., Bolloch, Joëlle, Hansen, Vibeke Waallann, Kendall, Richard: 9780300223934: Amazon.com: Books

‘Brilliant Exiles’: American Women In Early 20th-Century Paris

Marie Bracquemond: Art History's Lost Impressionist | Art & Object

Bracquemond, Marie - Impressionism

Eva Gonzalès - Wikipedia

Girl Awakening - Eva Gonzalès — Google Arts & Culture

Loise Catherine Breslau - Search Images

Louise Breslau | Impressionist painter | Tutt'Art@ | Pittura * Scultura * Poesia * Musica

Women Artists in Nineteenth-Century France | Essay | The Metropolitan Museum of Art | Heilbrunn Timeline of Art History

Famous Women Impressionists - Notable Female Impressionists