November 30, 2025

Post 16: "The Purple Haze" in Impressionism

 "Purple does something strange to me"

Charles Bukowski

 (The People Look Like Flowers at Last, 2007)


To help us understand why the colour purple  (also known as violet, lilac, or mauve) was so abundantly used by the Impressionists, let's take a look first at their colours in general.

The Impressionists were "the colourists", meaning they favoured colour over lines.  Additionally, colour to them carried more meaning than simply filling in the contours expectedly. With their colours, they stated: This is how I see it, and opened the freedom of expression doors for future artists. And so a hundred years later, we will have Mark Rothko saying: This is how I feel it, using exactly, and only, blocks of colour to express himself.

Unlike any seen in art before, Impressionists' colours were radically brilliant and vivid. Wynford Dewhurst (Impressionist Painting, 1904) explains: "The Impressionists purified the palette, discarding blacks, browns, ochres, and muddy colours generally,… These they replaced by new and brilliant combinations, the result of modern chemical research. Cadmium Pale, Violet de Cobalt, Garance rose doré, enabled them to attain a higher degree of luminosity than was before possible."


Hermitage Garden, Maison Rouge, 1877
Camille Pissarro (1830-1903)
50 x 60 cm, oil on canvas
Private Collection



Intertwined, science and industry transformed every aspect of society in the 19th century, art included, via experimental artists. Two important things happened, making it possible for the Impressionists to become revolutionary colourists: Michel Chevreul's Theory of Colours (he discovered that complementary colours, from the opposite sides of the wheel, put next to each other, enhance each other) and the Industrial production of synthetic dyes

Fun fact: Chevreul is one of the 72 scientists, engineers, mathematicians, whose names Eiffel engraved on the Eiffel Tower for the 1889 opening. Anticipating attacks from groups that found it ugly, Eiffel decided to 'armour' the tower with the names of prominent inventors since the French Revolution. Even funnier fact: Impressionists, although they approved of the Eiffel Tower and saw it as a symbol of progress and modernity, never actually painted it! 

Pissarro (painting above), being "The first Impressionist", as Cezanne called him, was leading the way in embracing and implementing complementary colours contrast and harmony theory. He even framed his bright, yellow-bathed paintings in purple frames!  Cezanne, in his 10-year Impressionist period, learned about colour from Pissarro, proudly presenting himself as "Cézanne the pupil of Pissarro".





                                      
Cliff Walk at Pourville, 1882
Claude Monet (1840-1926)
66.5 x 82.3 cm, oil on canvas


This breezy Monet painting is the one I chose to do a colour analysis for an Oxford course. Here is a brief version of it: 

For The Cliff Walk, Monet used bright hues of blue, green and yellow with touches of purple, pink, and orange. The shadowed areas (the dark sides of the cliff) have the same blue, green, and purple hues as the upper side of the cliff, but without the touches of yellow, white and pink. The sky is painted with translucent, thin and almost transparent layers, while the rest of the painting is done with opaque, thick ones. Emphasising the focus, the paint texture is most visible on the human figures and the umbrella. The lightest tone of the sea and the darkest tones of the cliff meet in the middle, creating a dramatic vertical. The effect of wind in the moving thick grass is achieved by short, curved brushstrokes of complementary colours put next to each other - blue next to yellow and orange next to green. 

There it was, the fundamentally different way of painting, using brush and hand movements, textures and colour thickness to achieve the desired effect. For the first time, artists are letting us see the process and the method. The irrevocable democratisation of art. The viewer is invited to engage. Modern art is born.




Waterloo Bridge in London, 1902
Claude Monet (1840-1926)
65.7 x 100.5 cm, oil on canvas


The House of Parliament, Seagulls, 1903
Claude Monet (1840-1926)
81 x 92 cm, oil on canvas



Now, about that "Purple Mania". The major reason for it was that Purple or Mauveine was the first synthetic dye to be developed in 1856 (UK)Then came the invention of cobalt violet in 1859 (France) and manganese violet in 1868 (Germany). With mass industrial production, artists gained access to a stable, long-lasting colour, packed in portable tubes for the first time. First, there was purple, and then over 2,000 synthetic dyes by 1913.

Before the mid-19th century, according to one study, purple could be found in only 0.06% of the 140,000 artworks examined (The World According to Colour, James Fox from Allen Tager's article). Artists avoided it as it aged badly, and therefore wasn't worth mixing pure blue and red for it. 

Monet had an additional advantage: his brother Leon had worked in the Swiss synthetic dye company Geigy since 1872 and gave Monet a tour of the factory near Roen. While in London, Monet painted a series (examples above) of the Waterloo Bridge (15 paintings) and The Houses of Parliament (19 paintings), all of which were studies and variations of light and purple colour discreetly interrupted by the architecture. At the time, critics called his London paintings - 'purple smears"! They were right in the sense that Monet basically painted the heavily polluted fog and smog over London. 



L'Hortensia, 1894
Berthe Morisot (1841-1895)
73,1 x 60,4 cm, oil on canvas

Paule Gobillard Painting, 1887
Berthe Morisot (1841-1895)
86 x 94 cm, oil on canvas


Après le Déjeuner (After Lunch), 1881
81 x 100 cm, oil on canvas
Berthe Morisot (1841-1895)


Now stable and affordable, purple synthetic dye bled from canvases into shops, ballrooms and households. It was known that this colour was the favourite of Empress Eugenie, often called the "Empress of fashion". Her reign ended in 1870, right at the time when purple dye became widely available. Ladies were crazy about it; finally, the middle classes could wear the 'royal' colour!

Art critics despised synthetic paints, especially those with a purple hue. They saw it as disrespectful to naturalism, a degradation and a real madness or mania. Many of the attacks came from journalists inexperienced in looking at colour in paintings, and instead focused on the narrative or metaphors. They thought of themselves as witty while writing things as "coloured wool" (Bertall on Monet, Thomson p.190) or "the tub of soapy water in which the Batignolles school drowns everything indiscriminately..."(Baron Schop on Impressionists, Thomson p.191) 


Danseuses aux jupes violettes, bras leves 
(Dancers in violet robes, raised hands), 1895-98
Edgar Degas (1834-1917)
90 x 53 cm, pastel

More than anything, purple paint was a statement for the Impressionists. It was a torch they carried in the battle against conformity, tradition, dusty rules and uniformity. To critics' annoyance, for the Impressionists, the subject was of very little importance ("He didn't allow things time to take hold of him", Bonnard on Monet, Thomson p. 220). The depiction of a sensation created by the play of colour and light was the only relevant goal.

"Not allowing things to take hold of him" could also be a perfect phrase for Rothko's work.  Here is the non-denominational chapel he created in Houston, Texas. A place "welcoming all religions and belonging to none". A place for praying, meditating, and thinking. 

Looking at light moving over time across purple panels, to me, is as fine a closing as any to this 100 Years of Purple and Art Story



Mark Rothko Chapel Photo






Sources:

Books:  
Impressionist Painting: Its Genesis and Development, by Wynford Dewhurst, Project Gutenberg eBookThe World According to Colour: A Cultural History (2021) by James Fox; Impressionism, Origins, Practice, Reception by Belinda Thomson


August 15, 2025

Post 15: Paintings only Female Impressionists could have painted

 



Steady as She Goes


"I love to see a young girl go out and grab the world by the lapels.
 Life is a bitch. 
You've got to go out and kick ass."
Maya Angelou, interview, 1986




Petit Fille dans un fauteuil bleu (Little Girl in a Blue Armchair), 1878
Mary Cassatt (1844-1926)
89.5 x 129.8 cm, oil on canvas
Little Girl National Gallery of Art Wash.DC



        

La Chambre Bleue (The Blue Room), 1923
Susan Valadon (1865-1938)
90 x 116 cm, oil on canvas
The Blue Room Centre Pompidou


I positioned these two 'blue' paintings next to each other, firstly because I love them dearly, and secondly, they certainly could have been painted only by women painters. 

Both were painted in Paris, the first one 22 years before 1900, and the other 23 years after 1900, providing a perfect frame for a period in which girls born into a restrictive society grew up to live in a rather progressive one. A little bored rebel who doesn't want to "sit properly", as well as a relaxed, self-sufficient, feeling-good-in-her-body smoker and reader, both were given freedom to rest comfortably and not pose. Only women painters could have given them that freedom.

Cassatt's iconic "Girl in a Blue Armchair", rejected by the American section of the Paris World's Fair for its "radicality" in 1878, was welcomed at the 1879 Impressionist exhibition, and opened the door for her to Parisian and international collectors. 

About 40 years later, Valadon's powerful "The Blue Room" portrays a woman who seems to have "kicked some ass" in her lifetime. A modern painting of a free modern woman. Although the years match, this could never be the grown-up girl from the first painting, as Cassatt and Valadon belonged to and painted two deeply segregated classes. Valadon, being a child at the same time as the little girl in the blue chair, was rarely bored; instead, she worked hard, helping her mother wash laundry for exactly those kinds of bourgeois families. 




Dans la Loge, 1878
Mary Cassatt (1844-1926)
81.28x66.04 cm, oil on canvas



Le Berceau (The Cradle), 1872
Berthe Morisot (1841-1895)
56 x 46.5 cm, oil on canvas
Le Berceau Morisot Orsay


After two paintings of women not bothered that we are looking at them, here are two Impressionist paintings of women looking at others, and the way they are doing that, makes these works modern and clearly painted by women.

Cassatt's Dans la Loge depicts a woman not as the object of beauty, purity, or virtue. Cassatt is capturing the ultimate contemporary moment: a free woman doing what is not expected in public space! She, just like a man, is actively looking at others instead of being a passive object of gaze. She is gazing. Whether her age gives her that freedom or her personality, she doesn't care what others think, including the man we see in the upper left corner. Some art historians even mention the phallic position of the fan in her hand. Cassatt is sending an unambiguous message: women are free to be as good or as bad as men.  

Next is the most famous painting by the most famous female Impressionist, Berthe Morisot. She showed this painting at the first Impressionist exhibition in 1874. Berthe participated in 7 out of 8 Impressionist exhibitions (missing one after the birth of her daughter). Besides the refined technique (the see-through curtain), we have a ground-breaking presentation of motherhood that opens many questions and provokes a debate, as great paintings usually do. Can you tell what is missing? The smile. Morisot portrays her sister Edna (at least as talented a painter as Berthe, who had to give up her artistic career after getting married and having a child) with an ambiguous facial expression. Is the woman in the painting tired, worried, or is it possible that she is missing being an artist and lamenting her choices? A century and a half later, women around the world can still relate to this painting and recognize that dilemma. Only a woman painter could have left that question open. This painting was bought in 1930 by the Louvre. Morisot, like Cassatt, could only dream during their lifetime of any museum buying their work. 

In the second half of the 19th century, the French government rarely bought female artists' paintings for national collections and museums (only 3% of all purchases, source Paris in Ruins). Their work would usually end up in private collections, where it often stayed to this day. That is one of many reasons why we see so few female artists in museum collections. A significant example being London's National Gallery - in its 2300 painting collection, only 21 are by women artists (9 of them). An innovative private guide in London offers a tour exploring those 21 paintings (link in sources).

Another reason would be that, in art history studies, women artists are usually all grouped in one chapter, like exotic birds, and presented only through the prism of how discriminated against they were from the present point of view. Or, more outrageously, not presented at all: the most famous art historian of the 20th century, in his widely referenced, 700-page opus, The Story of Art (the main book in the Oxford course I took), which covers art from prehistoric to modern, does not mention a single non-white or female artist. 

But, let's go back to people whose work aged well, like Louise Breslou. So, here is the one that "rebelled the system from within". She stayed loyal to Salon exhibitions, never joined the Impressionists, and yet didn't compromise her identity.



Gamines (Girls), 1890
Loise Catherine Breslau (1856- 1927)
120 x 220 cm, oil on canvas

I had the pleasure of standing in front of this huge, powerful painting three times. This photo doesn't do it any service, and the website of the Museum in Carpentras is of no help either. The happiness sparkles from every dot on this canvas, colours are vibrant and playful, and it is a pure joy to witness it in person.

This is one of the first paintings portraying an unorthodox subject for that time, a couple of women in love. No male painter would be allowed into this intimate moment. Loise Breslau lived with her girlfriend, also an artist, Madeleine Zillhardt, for 40 years.  They met at the Parisian Julian Academy (the only one taking female students at the time, but charging them more than men!), and Loise was the one who had a big, flourishing career. Her paintings were regularly exhibited at the Salon, well-received, won awards, and were actually bought by the French government. She also received the French Legion of Honour.



Henry Davison, 1880
Louise Breslau (1856-1927)
87 x 46 cm, oil on canvas

Now, if we look at how Louise portrays young British poet Davison, we could say that masculinity or even gender is not the point of attention here. He reminds me here of his contemporary Oscar Wilde, who was, among other things, a big supporter of women's emancipation. 

Thinking about it, I would say that one big contribution by female artists to society is bringing androgyny to the public eye and loosening up the assigned gender roles and looks. To illustrate my point, below are 2 enigmatic paintings by the outstanding Romaine Brooks, who took queerness to the next level:



Peter (A Young English Girl), 1923-24
Romaine Brooks (1874-1970)
91.9 x 62.3 cm, oil on canvas




Self-Portrait, 1923
117.5 x 68.3 cm, oil on canvas
Romaine Brooks (1874-1979)


In her self-portrait, by wearing lipstick and men's clothes, Brooks (also awarded the Legion of Honour) claims the right to define for herself who she is. Primarily, women in their path of emancipation wanted to be perceived as persons, and on that path, female artists certainly carried their weight.

Romaine Brooks lived an extraordinary life, almost 100 years long, but decided to stop painting after finishing this portrait at the age of 49.

I suppose in life, an equally important skill to keep going is knowing when to stop.




Sources:

Books: The Story of Art Without Men (Katy Hessel) and Representing Women (Linda Nochlin)

Getting There: Maya Angelou - POLITICO

Women in the National Gallery - guided tour to see female artists

Bing Videos - In Loge, Khan Academy commentary

Christies - Christian Levett's collection of Ancient to Modern Art from the Mougins Museum of Classical Art

Deux jeunes filles près de l'eau - Louise Breslau | Musée d'Orsay - preparatory drawing

Mary Cassatt's Famous Paintings & Feminism - iTravelWithArt

La Luministe - The Passionate Life of Berthe Morisot - iTravelWithArt

The Women Who Dared to Paint | Sotheby’s Magazine | Sotheby’s

Rewriting Art History: How Fede Galizia Brings Women Artists into Focus | Expert Voices | Sotheby’s

3 Women Artists Who Broke Boundaries | 19th Century European Art | Sotheby's

Kunsthalle Bremen

Who Are the Most Important Female Impressionists?

List of women Impressionists - Wikipedia

Women Artists in Paris, 1850-1900: Madeline, Laurence, Alsdorf, Bridget, Becker, Jane R., Bolloch, Joëlle, Hansen, Vibeke Waallann, Kendall, Richard: 9780300223934: Amazon.com: Books

‘Brilliant Exiles’: American Women In Early 20th-Century Paris

Marie Bracquemond: Art History's Lost Impressionist | Art & Object

Bracquemond, Marie - Impressionism

Eva Gonzalès - Wikipedia

Girl Awakening - Eva Gonzalès — Google Arts & Culture

Loise Catherine Breslau - Search Images

Louise Breslau | Impressionist painter | Tutt'Art@ | Pittura * Scultura * Poesia * Musica

Women Artists in Nineteenth-Century France | Essay | The Metropolitan Museum of Art | Heilbrunn Timeline of Art History

Famous Women Impressionists - Notable Female Impressionists

April 26, 2025

Post 14: Impressionists and Venice

 "Devilishly hard to paint"




Hello, Dear Reader,
Thank you for stopping by! You can find this post now at this new address:

   https://mimibarbulovicpillsbury.substack.com/p/impressionists-in-venice



See you there! 

March 28, 2025

Post 13: Spring Impressionist Landscapes



Dematerialization mirroring sensation

To see, we must forget the name of the thing we are looking at ~ Claude Monet



Fruit trees are blooming again in Provence. The sunlight from the dew in the grass reflects through the air onto delicate almond flowers. That sensory effect was never better interpreted than in Impressionists' paintings. Join me on a little trip enjoying their spring landscapes, aiming the spotlight at the ones with blossoming trees.



Apple Blossoms, 1873
Charles-Francois Daubigny (1817-1878)
58.7 x 84.8 cm, oil on canvas
Apple Blossoms Daubigny The Met


Apple Trees in Blossom, 1874
Charles- Francois Daubigny (1817-1878)
85 x 157 cm, oil on canvas
Blooming Trees Daubigny NG Scotland 

Daubigny, a precursor of Impressionism, was one of the Barbizon group of painters Monet very much looked up to. He painted blossoming trees every spring, starting in 1857, and continued for the next 20 years until the end of his life. The Barbizon Group of painters were the first to paint in the open and to focus on true colors under the natural light. Daubigny was also the favorite landscape painter of Vincent van Gogh and you will find at the end of this post a story of the poetic way he paid homage to Daubigny.



Apple Blossom Time in Arc-la-Bataille
Wynford Dewhurst (1865-1941)
38.3 x 55.4 cm, oil on canvas
Apple Blossom Dewhurst Christie's

Digging deeper in the Impressionist drawers of the past, I found Wynford Dewhurst, a British painter ("Monet from Manchester") and theorist. He wrote the book Impressionist Painting, its Genesis and Development in 1904 (available on the Gutenberg Project platform). The book is packed with first-hand accounts and anecdotes from his mentor and idol Monet, Mary Cassatt, Cezanne, and other key art figures in France at the time. Dewhurst felt that his compatriots were falling behind Americans in comprehending the importance of Impressionism in art. 

Note how in the painting above, like a true Impressionist, he moves the horizon line way above (or other times way under), while Daubigny still keeps it in the classical central position


Spring (Fruit Trees in Bloom), 1873
Claude Monet (1840-1926)
62.2 x 100.6 cm, oil on canvas
Monet Spring Trees Met Museum


After visiting his mentor and his admirer, we arrive at the man himself—Monet, one of the world's greatest landscape artists. As the description in the Met Museum says, we can not be sure what kind of fruit trees these above are. The painting was first named Plum, then Apple Trees, only to be left today as Fruit Trees. This proves the point Monet was trying to make- forget about details and immerse yourself in the magical play of the light, color, surfaces, and air in the moment.

In the above-mentioned book by Dewhurst, we can find an anecdote proving Monet's dedication: in 1889 invited by poet Maurice Rollinat (who would later tell the story to Dewhurst), Monet spent 3 months in  Fresseline in Creuse and painted 23 paintings there. He was especially taken by one tree hanging on the top of a cliff, painting it at different times of the day from various angles. At one point, the weather got so bad that he had to stop painting for three weeks. Arriving again at his scene, he found the tree budding. Determined to paint it as it was when he started, Monet called the whole village and orchestrated them to take every single bud from the poor tree by the next morning when he would be back to continue his work. 



Springtime, 1886
Claude Monet (1840-1926)
64.8 x 80.6 cm, oil on canvas
Spring Monet Fitz Museum UK


He made up for that 'crime' later as I found out in another story from the same book: hundreds of poplar trees along the Seine were to be cut by the order of the French government, and used for palisading the Universal Exhibition in Paris in 1900. Monet bought those grounds before the government got to them, and saved the poplars, immortalizing them in later paintings.

Speaking of the Universal Exhibition, the one in 1900 in Paris attracted  51 million visitors (France at the time had 41.5 million inhabitants) - a new world record. The French government included a large number of Impressionists in its exhibition "The Best of French Art in the XIX Century" establishing their elevated status domestically and internationally from then on.




Small Houses in Auvers (near Pantoise), 1873/4
Paul Cezanne (1839-1906)
40.7 x 50.9 cm, oil on canvas
Cezanne Blossom Harvard Art Museums


Printemps. Pruniers en fleurs (Spring. Plum Trees Flowering), 1877
Camille Pissarro (1830-1903)
65.5 x 81 cm, oil on canvas
Pissarro Orsay

And here are some blossoming trees from the two good friends - Cezanne and Pissarro who painted many scenes next to each other (like these from the Pentoise area, even though they were dated differently). They bonded when they met in 1861, feeling like outsiders with strong accents in Paris (Pissarro's Caribbean and Cezanne's Provençal). Pissarro was one of the rare ones to recognize early on something special in Cezanne's artistry. While Pissarro stayed loyal to the Impressionistic process of disintegrating the materialistic elements into sparkles of colors and light, Cezanne was heading in almost the opposite direction - "building" with color, as he said, "I want to make something solid and durable out of Impressionism".




Page of Van Gogh's letter to his brother Theo
with a sketch of Daubigny's garden
Letter Van Gogh Museum


Daubigny's Garden, 1890
Vincent van Gogh (1853-1890)
51 x 51.2 cm, oil on canvas
Daubigny Jarden VV Gogh Museum



Le Jardin de Daubigny, 1890
Vincent van Gogh (1853-1890)
53.2 x 103.5 cm, oil on canvas
Vincent Jardin Hiroshima Museum

Le Jardin de Daubigny (avec un chat blue), 1890
Vincent van Gogh (1853-1890)
56 x 101. 5 cm, oil on canvas
Blue Cat Art Museum Basel 

(it should be here, but it is not at the moment, there is some dispute about whether they have the original or a copy)



As promised, here is a story (gathered from different sources you can find below) of Vincent van Gogh paying respect to Daubigny. 
It is 1890 and Van Gogh is as mentally exhausted, as his brother Theo is physically and financially. Camille Pissarro helps him go to Auvers-sur-Oise to be taken under the care of the famous Dr Gachet. Van Gogh learns that the house where his admired Daubigny lived, is in Auvers with his widow still living there. 

In a letter to his brother (image above) Van Gogh, as usual, writes about paintings he is working on and sketches the Daubigny's garden that he is about to paint. The first of the three paintings was done more in an Impressionist manner while the other two are in Van Gogh's original style, belonging to Post-Impressionism and almost Expressionism. The two in his Post-Impressionist style are painted in different weather conditions, one on a sunny day and the other under the turbulent sky with a blue cat.

Here is an easy way to remember the difference between Impressionism and Expressionism: Impressionists painted shadows blue and Expressionists painted their cats blue!

Auvers is the place where Vincent lived during the last months of his life, where he painted Wheatfield with Crows known as his 'suicide note' after which he shot himself in the stomach. He was buried there next to his brother (who died 6 months later) right by those wheatfields.

But we must remember him by the endless magnificent paintings he created while overcoming his pain with beauty. His series of around 20 paintings of Blooming Peach, Apricot, Almond, Plum, and Apple Orchards of Provence, painted in Arles and around Saint-Rémy-de-Provence are immeasurable sources of joy, beauty, and hope. Many of them are in Van Gogh Museum in Amsterdam, like this one:


Small Pear Tree in Blossom, 1888
Vincent van Gogh (1853-1890)
73.6 x 46.3 cm, oil on canvas
Van Gogh Museum Single Tree




Sources:


Artist profile - Wynford Dewhurst | Great British Life

Claude Monet (1840–1926) - The Metropolitan Museum of Art

Claude Monet - Orchard in Bloom | Národní galerie Praha - sbírky

"J'ai été fulgurée par Claude Monet", une passionnée raconte l'histoire des tableaux creusois du peintre

Spring (Fruit Trees in Bloom) by Claude Monet - Artvee

The 1900 Universal Exhibition — Google Arts & Culture

Pavilions of the 1900 Universal Exhibition — Google Arts & Culture

Claude Monet | Spring (Fruit Trees in Bloom) | The Metropolitan Museum of Art

Plum Trees in Blossom - Claude Monet — Google Arts & Culture

Monet's Palette in the Twentieth Century: 'Water-Lilies' and 'Irises' | Technical Bulletin | National Gallery, London

Orchard in Bloom, Louveciennes - Camille Pissarro

Plum Trees in Blossom, Éragny (Camille Pissarro (1830–1903)) | Museu.MS

Catalogue de la 4e Exposition de peinture , par M. Bracquemond... Mlle Cassatt, MM. Degas, Forain, Lebourg, Monet, Pissaro... du 10 avril au 11 mai 1879... 28, avenue de l'Opéra, Paris | Gallica

What are the Most Beautiful and Famous Paintings About Spring? - Dandelion Chandelier

Vegetable Garden and Trees in Blossom, Spring, Pontoise, by Camille Pissarro, 1877 | Great Big Canvas

The Hermitage at Pontoise by Camille Pissarro

Orchard in Pontoise, 1877 - Paul Cezanne - WikiArt.org

Pioneering Modern Painting: Cezanne and Pissarro 1865–1885 | MoMA

Speaking — Joachim Pissarro

Apple Trees in Blossom by Charles-François Daubigny | National Galleries of Scotland

Spring fever | Christie's

Flowering Orchards - Wikipedia

Garden of Daubigny, 1890 by Vincent Van Gogh

Le Jardin de Daubigny — Wikipédia